![Blake, Seymour & Thorp v Fox [2021]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/003c20_288aede1956d456da7fe750492b86688~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_311,h_233,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_auto/003c20_288aede1956d456da7fe750492b86688~mv2.png)
Blake, Seymour & Thorp v Fox [2021]
Background The claim was brought by Simon Blake, Colin Seymour and Nicola Thorp who accused Laurence Fox, a former London mayoral candidate, of defaming them after he called them paedophiles on Twitter. The comments followed a tweet from the supermarket Sainsbury’s supporting Black History Month which led to the defendant calling for people to boycott the supermarket. The defendant served a Defence disputing defamatory meaning and serious harm, while also serving a Countercla
![Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors [2021]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/003c20_6657842b9764460dbc1dc14afe2b77fe~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_38,h_25,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_auto/003c20_6657842b9764460dbc1dc14afe2b77fe~mv2.jpg)
![ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] – The Supreme Court delivers another blow to the British media](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/003c20_61ca34e9d65448b7ad6338ba1b512a70~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_38,h_28,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_auto/003c20_61ca34e9d65448b7ad6338ba1b512a70~mv2.png)
![Blake, Seymour & Thorp v Fox [2021]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/003c20_288aede1956d456da7fe750492b86688~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_38,h_29,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_auto/003c20_288aede1956d456da7fe750492b86688~mv2.png)
![Abramovich v (1) HarperCollins Publishers Limited (2) Catherine Belton [2021]](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/003c20_5840605aa29f4ff9aa2f6b4b3bf36e28~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_38,h_29,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_auto/003c20_5840605aa29f4ff9aa2f6b4b3bf36e28~mv2.png)
![Lloyd v Google [2021] - Good News for Data Controllers](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/003c20_8c65cbc080af4cddbd5be31ec2c946e1~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_38,h_25,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_auto/003c20_8c65cbc080af4cddbd5be31ec2c946e1~mv2.png)
